9 Comments
User's avatar
Daniel Ormsbee's avatar

This is why it’s so hard to engineer. You’re extracting energy from steady chaos. Seems a lot like trying to engineer biology to do what you want from my view. There’s so much going on underneath the hood here that we can’t see and don’t understand that it verges on magic or “fake science”

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Wilhelm's avatar

Yes, it's very hard. But not impossible IMHO! Nikola Tesla, Gabriel Kron, Terrence W. Barrett are some of the names deeply related to this topic. Biology? Yeah, why not, I mean biology is extremely "smart" and probably uses reality's toolkit to the fullest, including the stuff discussed in the article. Magic, indeed!

Expand full comment
Liam Weavers's avatar

Power amplification is not creation but coordination. A local perturbation invoking a global response. Control emerges when the field, not just the point, is defined.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Wilhelm's avatar

Well said as always, Liam!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 21
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Wilhelm's avatar

Tell me, Onion of truth! What is the field? It must match to something engineerable. Calling it aether or consciousness is not enough. I'd love to make that step. But I'm an engineer after all. Theory is good, experiments are better. I can make a vector potential, I can shape it. It's the most fundamental engineerable field I know. Beyond that? Inspire me!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 21
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Daniel Ormsbee's avatar

Appreciate the spiritualism here, but I agree with Paul. It’s physics and fields, not spiritualism. The spirit world meshes with the consciousness aspect of the field/toroidal work, but I believe it’s helpful to see it as a separate issue to comprehend. (Even if the base physics is similar)

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Wilhelm's avatar

Exactly. It's fine to research either aspect, but denying that it's all connected is just foolish. The spiritual and the material are equally "real", and reality wouldn't exist without either one of them.

Expand full comment
Michael Eric West's avatar

@ Stupid Onion 🧅 Head:

🤣 Ppl like you crack me up! You’re literally only speaking about quantum entanglement bud… and loosely how we live inside the universe/are the universe. (No shit Sherlock)…

That’s like saying the fish in the water is also part of the ocean!?!? Omg 😱. What a coincidence!!??

You don’t look great putting ppl down for wanting facts and data… not speeches and instant judgement like a religious style ideology pusher would do…btw ✅

Haha 🤣 (ya that’s how you sound)

Don’t berate someone for thinking differently than you. Leave actual science to actual creative, intelligent, & scientific minds. (The door to the willfully ignorant heavy spirit “hoo-ha” is that a way 👉🏿).

If you want to try and mix them both together, (with respect to each), like I’m trying to do… then come and talk with the big dogs 🐕. With some respect 🫡. Not hide behind your keyboard style shots ppl take these days because it’s “easy” to do so with zero repercussions.

Until then… expect to get what you give: predictable prejudice jabs from a smelly rotten childish idiotic preaching like a werewolf priest in an ugly onion suit.

Respect science and it will respect you. (Your whole flipping reality and human life have benefited from it).

Show some gosh darn respect next time! Without science… we would all not live past 30-40 years old. Remember that. 👌

🗣️ I have spoken…

-Michael Eric West

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Wilhelm's avatar

Very well said. Respectful communication and bidirectional thinking is key, otherwise the split between "materialists" and "impractical dreamers" (in Walter Russell's terms) will only grow, while it is our duty to close that gap!

Written from my materialist phone 🤣

Expand full comment